{"id":4374,"date":"2026-07-22T18:43:53","date_gmt":"2026-07-22T16:43:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/?p=4374"},"modified":"2026-07-22T18:43:53","modified_gmt":"2026-07-22T16:43:53","slug":"a-classic-check-for-sale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/en\/klasicky-sach-na-prodej\/","title":{"rendered":"Classical chess for sale?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sometimes it pays off to leaf through old chess magazines. Sometime in the mid-nineties, I read an interview with the then young Kazakh grandmaster Vladislav Tkachev, who was just entering the world elite. I remember only one thought from it \u2013 but it was absolutely precise.<\/p>\n<p>At that time, Tkachev declared that classical chess should give way to a faster, more dynamic format. Back then, rapid was called <strong>active chess<\/strong> and games lasted about thirty minutes per game. In his opinion, this format should become the new form of top-level chess, while blitz would actually take over the role of rapid.<\/p>\n<p>To the objection that such a shortening of time would inevitably lead to a decline in the quality of games, he replied with disarming certainty: <strong>\u201eNot at all. Higher concentration during the game will compensate for the lost time!\u201c<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I do not hide that at the time I considered this opinion a whim of a talented youngster. And I was not alone. Few people then thought that such considerations could one day become part of FIDE\u2019s official policy.<\/p>\n<p>About thirty years have passed. And suddenly we find ourselves almost in the same place.<\/p>\n<p>I do not consider FIDE\u2019s decision to include the time control <strong>45 minutes + 30 seconds per move<\/strong> (of course for the entire game) among classical time controls as a mere rule adjustment. In my opinion, it is a step that can fundamentally change the very essence of classical chess \u2013 a game that for more than a hundred years has been regarded not only as a sport but also as a form of science and art.<\/p>\n<p>So what does the FIDE leadership and President Arkadij Dvorkovich plan?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Dvorkovic-bazilisek.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-4376\" src=\"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Dvorkovic-bazilisek-300x168.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"364\" height=\"204\" srcset=\"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Dvorkovic-bazilisek-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Dvorkovic-bazilisek.jpg 640w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 364px) 100vw, 364px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #333399;\"><strong>Changes in the competition system<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p>The competition system for the World Championship title 2026-2028 will undergo the following changes:<\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #808000;\"><strong>Qualification for the 2028 Candidates Tournament<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p>The eight participants of the 2028 Candidates Tournament will come from these four qualification paths:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Qualification path<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Number of places<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>FIDE Grand Swiss 2027<\/td>\n<td><strong>2<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Total Chess World Championship Tour 2026\u20132027<\/td>\n<td><strong>2<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FIDE World Cup 2027<\/td>\n<td><strong>2<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FIDE Circuit 2026\u20132027<\/td>\n<td><strong>2<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Total: 8 players<\/strong><\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #808000;\"><strong>What has changed compared to the 2024\u20132026 cycle?<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p>Overview of the most important changes:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>2024\u20132026 cycle<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>2026\u20132028 cycle<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Grand Swiss \u2013 <strong>2 places<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>2 places<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>World Cup \u2013 <strong>3 places<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>2 places<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>FIDE Circuit \u2013 <strong>2 places<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>2 places<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rating place \u2013 <strong>1 player<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>cancelled<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Total Chess Tour \u2013 did not exist<\/td>\n<td><strong>2 new places<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>This results in four fundamental novelties:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>the qualifying place by rating was cancelled<\/strong>,<\/li>\n<li><strong>World Cup lost one qualifying place<\/strong> (from three to two),<\/li>\n<li><strong>FIDE Circuit \u2013 the 2 best results over a two-year period count<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>a completely new qualification path<\/strong> became <strong>Total Chess World Championship Tour 2026\u20132027<\/strong>, from which the two best players in the overall ranking will qualify.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This last change \u2013 the so-called absolute world champion \u2013 will be the most significant in the long term. For the first time, FIDE has created a separate two-year series, which becomes one of the main pillars in the fight for the world championship title.<\/p>\n<p>In the next step, let us take a detailed look at <strong>the new definition of classical time control<\/strong>, because it is closely related to the functioning of this \u201eTour\u201c and represents the second major change simultaneously approved by FIDE.<\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #333399;\"><strong>New time control<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p>Below I present the text in a deliberately <strong>descriptive and neutral form. The evaluation of the system and criticism can be found by the reader below<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #808000;\"><strong>FIDE introduces a new classical time control 45 + 30<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p>By decision of the FIDE Council, one of the most significant changes in classical chess rules in more than a century has taken place. Alongside adjustments to the World Championship qualification system, the definition of <strong>classical (standard) time control, i.e. so-called serious games, has been newly expanded.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Until now, the classical time control was considered to be <strong>primarily<\/strong> a time control of the type <strong>90 minutes + 30 minutes until move 40, a time control with an additional 30 minutes + 30 seconds increment per move<\/strong>, or other time controls meeting the minimum time limits set by FIDE.<\/p>\n<p>However, the new rules allow games played at the time control<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>45 minutes for the entire game plus 30 seconds increment per move (45 + 30).<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>to be considered classical (standard-rated) games. This time control represents approximately half the time of the previously minimum classical controls used, yet the results of these games will be included in the FIDE classical (Standard) rating. FIDE refers to this format as <strong>Fast Classical \u2013 rapid classical<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #808000;\"><strong>Why did FIDE accept this change?<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p>According to published materials, FIDE pursues several goals:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>to shorten the length of top-level tournaments,<\/li>\n<li>to increase the attractiveness of competitions for spectators and organisers,<\/li>\n<li>to enable more rounds to be played in a shorter time,<\/li>\n<li>to unify the rules for newly emerging elite competitions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #808000;\"><strong>Where will the new time control appear?<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p>FIDE's decision was not only a change in rating regulations. The new time control has also been incorporated into top-level world chess competitions. The most important examples are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Total Chess World Championship Tour<\/strong>, whose classical section will be played at the time control <strong>45 + 30<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>FIDE World Cup 2027<\/strong>, and the newly introduced initial \u201eSwiss phase\u201c will also use the time control <strong>45 + 30<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Thus, the 45 + 30 time control is not just an experiment, but part of the official system of top-level world chess!<\/span><\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #333399;\"><strong>Practical significance<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p>The new 45 + 30 time control is therefore not an isolated change in rating rules. On the contrary, it directly affects qualification for the World Championship.<\/p>\n<p>Of the four main qualification paths, two will either directly use the time control <strong>45 + 30<\/strong>, or will include tournaments played at this time control. In other words, the new definition of classical chess becomes one of the fundamental building blocks of the entire 2026\u20132028 championship cycle.<\/p>\n<p>The changes were well summarised in a short video on ChessBase India by Sagar Shah:<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"FIDE announces massive changes for the 2028 FIDE Candidates Qualification paths\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/7Hfc9gD3UM8?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>At the end of the \u201eneutral section\u201c I add the official text from the FIDE leadership.<\/p>\n<p><strong>14 July: <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201eThe qualification system for the FIDE Candidates tournaments is one of the cornerstones of the FIDE World Championship cycle and it is essential that it continues to evolve alongside the game of chess itself.<\/p>\n<p>These changes have been carefully crafted to make the qualification process more balanced, transparent and performance-based. By introducing the Total Chess World Championship Tour as a new path, refining the allocation of places at the FIDE World Cup, and placing greater emphasis on results achieved during the cycle, we ensure that every route to the Candidates tournament rewards sustained top-level performance at the highest competitive level\u2026\u201c<\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #333399;\"><strong>Classical chess in time trouble<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p>I do not consider FIDE\u2019s decision to include the time control <strong>45 minutes + 30 seconds per move<\/strong> I do not consider classical time controls to be a mere technical change of regulations. In my opinion, it is a negative intervention into the very essence of chess!<\/p>\n<p>Let us start with a simple question: Isn\u2019t it enough just to look at today\u2019s top-level tournaments?<\/p>\n<p>Even at the current time control <strong>90 minutes + 30 seconds increment after move 40<\/strong> grandmasters quite often get into mutual time trouble. From about move thirty to thirty-five many games cease to resemble classical chess. Instead of calmly searching for the best continuation, we watch a fight against the clock. Sometimes the conclusions of games no longer resemble rapid chess, but straight blitz.<\/p>\n<p>And now FIDE wants to halve the base time even further! Why? Are they planning that two rounds will be played per day at top tournaments? The recently deceased patron Oleg Skvorcov spoke about a similar system for many years.<\/p>\n<p>Does FIDE believe that shorter games automatically mean more spectators? If so, where is the evidence?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/MS-2036-6.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-4384\" src=\"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/MS-2036-6-300x200.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"540\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/MS-2036-6-300x200.png 300w, https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/MS-2036-6-1024x683.png 1024w, https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/MS-2036-6-768x512.png 768w, https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/MS-2036-6.png 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 540px) 100vw, 540px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>Is it really \u201ejust\u201c a joke? Are we not in an iteration heading precisely in this direction?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Are there serious statistics showing that spectators prefer ever faster time controls? Has a comparative analysis of the viewership of classical chess, rapid and blitz at the highest level even been conducted? Or are the rules of one of the oldest sports disciplines being changed based on feelings and marketing estimates?<\/p>\n<p>And one more question suggests itself. Has a new definition of classical chess arisen because it was demanded by the development of chess itself? Or because the rules needed to be adapted to (Carlsen\u2019s) new project <strong>Total Chess World Championship Tour<\/strong>? In my opinion: <strong>\u201eB is correct!\u201c<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Note: It is certainly legitimate to ask whether the Total Chess World Championship Tour project would have arisen in its current form if its most prominent face had not been Magnus Carlsen. We do not have an answer \u2013 or proof. What is certain is that very few chess players in history have had such sporting and media influence to be able to fundamentally affect the direction of world chess.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>It is hard to resist the impression that this time it was not the new series adapting to FIDE rules, but rather FIDE rules adapting to the new series!<\/strong><\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #808000;\"><strong>A decision at the least appropriate time<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p>Perhaps even more than the content of the change itself, I am struck by <strong>the moment<\/strong>, <strong>when<\/strong> it was made!\u00a0<strong>Just two months before the FIDE electoral congress!<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>At precisely the time when the leadership of the world federation should primarily be managing the entrusted institution and presenting the delegates with the results of their work, it adopts one of the most fundamental changes to classical chess in many decades.<\/p>\n<p>Why now? Why was such a crucial decision not left to the newly elected FIDE leadership? Why was there no public expert discussion involving leading world grandmasters, organisers, arbiters, coaches, and national federations? Has the definition of classical chess changed so often that two months make no difference? On the contrary.<\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #808000;\"><strong>Why are the rules changed almost every cycle?<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p>There is one more question that worries me.<\/p>\n<p>For decades, there was a stable system for the World Championship title fights. Between <strong>1948 and 1974<\/strong>\u00a0the qualification cycle remained basically the same. Yes, there were partial adjustments. Occasionally the number of participants or the format of a competition changed. But the fundamental philosophy remained intact.<\/p>\n<p>And today? Can we even find two consecutive World Championship cycles played under the same rules? It seems that as soon as one cycle ends, another reform is being prepared. Why?<\/p>\n<p>The most common answer is: <strong>\u201eTimes are changing fast.\u201c <\/strong>Really? Did time not pass before? Did not Botvinnik, Smyslov, Tal, Petrosian or Fischer also live in an era of technical progress and social change? Yet the then leaders of world chess never thought of rewriting the World Championship rules after every cycle. <strong>Stability was considered a value. Today it seems to have become an obstacle.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #808000;\"><strong>The creative side of the problem<\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p>In my opinion, however, the greatest danger lies elsewhere. In the very quality of chess itself!<\/p>\n<p>Let us ask another question. <strong>When was the last time, dear readers, that you saw a game played at the current time control of 90 + 30 without a time control after move 40, in which one of the players demonstrated truly exquisite technique, a deep long-term plan or an exceptionally precise calculation of complex variations in the end?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Such games are becoming rarer. Not because today's grandmasters are significantly weaker than their predecessors. (Although I do express my opinions on this matter quite often...) They are becoming rarer mainly because even the best players in the world often do not have time to show everything they are capable of.<\/p>\n<p>The endgame was for generations the pinnacle of chess art. It was precisely there that technical maturity, depth of strategic thinking and accuracy of calculation were best demonstrated.<\/p>\n<p>What will remain of this tradition if a player often has only a few minutes at best for the decisive part of the game?<\/p>\n<p>Does FIDE have something against chess endgames? Does it have something against deep strategic plans? Does it have something against exceptionally precise calculation of variations that require not only talent but also time? Or on the contrary, does it consider it desirable that an increasing number of top games are decided by errors made under time pressure? Perhaps that is what attracts more spectators...<\/p>\n<p>If this is indeed the goal, then it would be good to say so openly. Because then it is no longer just a change of time control.<strong> It is a change of the very ideal of classical chess!<\/strong><\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #333399;\"><strong>The first critical voices<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p>At the end of this somewhat unusual article, let us look at what some prominent personalities think about both main changes \u2013 that is, the change of the World Championship format and the minimum time control for classical play.<\/p>\n<p>First, let us give the floor to one of the most qualified \u2013 the world\u2019s number two (or three) by rating, Hikaru Nakamura.<\/p>\n<p>However, I cannot resist one personal remark. Oh, how times change! Just a few years ago, I tried to avoid Nakamura\u2019s videos and opinions whenever possible. Today, I would probably endorse most of what he said in the video below. How did this happen? I certainly am not worrying about that right now\u2026<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"FIDE CHANGED EVERYTHING!!\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/ENrueEdTpeM?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Besides his sharp criticism, let us also notice one more thing: Hikaru also sees a big problem in the next planned step. The future after 50% shortening of the time control clearly points towards \u201eSkvorcov tournaments\u201c with two rounds per day!<\/p>\n<p>According to me, the next step will also be shortening the time increment from 30 to 10 seconds per move. The effort to achieve this is so obvious that it can hardly be called an Overton window anymore. After all, two rounds per day are not unusual even at strong tournaments nowadays.<\/p>\n<p>Time is being saved. <strong>And time is money!<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Miguel Illescas Cordoba (Spanish grandmaster):<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>In my humble opinion, it makes no sense for qualification tournaments for the World Championship to have a different time limit. Classical chess should be preserved. Amateurs love it, the media love it, why should FIDE devalue its most precious asset?<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Peter Heine Nielsen (Danish grandmaster and coach of the 15th and 16th World Champions):<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Why does the council make such decisions just before the end of its mandate? Leave it to the soon-to-be newly elected council, and do so in a proper democratic way.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>To conclude, I will present a response that aptly captures the essence of the frequently cited arguments:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Spectator:\u00a0<\/strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">Everything is changing! Do you want to throw away the smartphone and bring back the telegraph?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>Reply:\u00a0<\/strong><span style=\"color: #800000;\">And should we even learn the times tables? Calculators managed it, and the smartphone can do much more...<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>I might dare to add this myself: <\/strong>The conclusion of the following game <strong>Niemann vs. Erigaisi<\/strong> (blitz, Hong Kong 2026) and Arjun\u2019s monstrous calculation in time trouble will be called admirable, or even beautiful, by many...<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 1280px;\" class=\"wp-video\"><video class=\"wp-video-shortcode\" id=\"video-4374-1\" width=\"1280\" height=\"720\" preload=\"metadata\" controls=\"controls\"><source type=\"video\/mp4\" src=\"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Niemann-Erigaisi-blic-PK-monstrozni-blesk-propocet-Sagar.mp4?_=1\" \/><a href=\"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Niemann-Erigaisi-blic-PK-monstrozni-blesk-propocet-Sagar.mp4\">https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Niemann-Erigaisi-blic-PK-monstrozni-blesk-propocet-Sagar.mp4<\/a><\/video><\/div>\n<p><strong>But, dear readers, is this \u201ethis\u201c really the primary or even the only thing we admire in our beautiful game?<\/strong><\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"color: #333399;\"><strong>What next?<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n<p>Since the publication of the statement by FIDE President Arkadij Dvorkovi\u010d on 14 July, not enough time has passed for a larger number of former world champions, leading grandmasters, coaches or commentators to express their views \u2013 especially in the middle of the holiday season. Nevertheless, it is already clear that the change has sparked an exceptionally lively discussion.<\/p>\n<p>So far, this discussion is developing not only in expert articles and interviews but also on many internet platforms. Besides YouTube, heated debates are taking place, for example, on Reddit, the social network X (Twitter), in discussions on Chess.com, or on various chess forums. It can be expected that in the coming weeks, more interviews and public statements by prominent figures in world chess will appear.<\/p>\n<p>Personally, I am very curious about the opinion of former world champion Viswanathan Anand. Not only because he is among the most respected chess authorities today, but also because, as FIDE Vice President, he is directly involved in the leadership of the world federation. His perspective could reveal which arguments led FIDE to such a fundamental change.<\/p>\n<p>Opinions of other leading grandmasters, coaches and commentators are only beginning to emerge. There is no doubt that FIDE\u2019s decision will be one of the most discussed topics in world chess in the coming weeks. And perhaps not only in the coming weeks. The new definition of classical time control does not affect only a single regulation. It touches the very concept of top-level chess and may influence its form for many years to come.<\/p>\n<p>However the development proceeds, there is nothing left but to wait. In two months \u2013 traditionally on the occasion of the Chess Olympiad \u2013 a new FIDE leadership will be elected. And yet we know that today\u2019s times change almost at lightning speed. What seems to be a definitive decision today may be subject to discussion again tomorrow. And some changes have \u2013 despite great expectations \u2013 a truly ephemeral life.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>For interest, below I provide a list of all FIDE presidents (excluding the disputed period of World War II). Older readers in particular may \u201econfront their memory with reality\u201c...<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Order<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>FIDE President<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Nationality<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>In office<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>1.<\/td>\n<td>Alexander Rueb<\/td>\n<td>Netherlands<\/td>\n<td><strong>1924\u20131949<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2.<\/td>\n<td>Folke Rogard<\/td>\n<td>Sweden<\/td>\n<td><strong>1949\u20131970<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>3.<\/td>\n<td>Max Euwe<\/td>\n<td>Netherlands<\/td>\n<td><strong>1970\u20131978<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>4.<\/td>\n<td>Fridrik Olafsson<\/td>\n<td>Iceland<\/td>\n<td><strong>1978\u20131982<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>5.<\/td>\n<td>Florencio Campomanes<\/td>\n<td>Philippines<\/td>\n<td><strong>1982\u20131995<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>6.<\/td>\n<td>Kirsan Ilyumzhinov<\/td>\n<td>Russia<\/td>\n<td><strong>1995\u20132018<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>7.<\/td>\n<td>Arkady Dvorkovich<\/td>\n<td>Russia<\/td>\n<td><strong>since 2018<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>And perhaps one more piece of information or a reminder: <strong>chess clocks<\/strong> were used for the first time at an international tournament <strong>in London in 1883<\/strong>. Their introduction represented a significant step forward \u2013 it prevented infinitely long thinking and allowed a fair measurement of both players' time. However, after more than 140 years, the world of chess is once again facing a fundamental question: should clocks only measure time, or are they beginning to determine the very character of a classical game?<\/p>\n<p>Wikipedia states that at the London tournament the time control was fifteen moves per hour. Practically, this meant that after the fifteenth, thirtieth, forty-fifth, sixtieth move, and so on, it was checked whether the player had kept to the prescribed pace of play.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Hodiny-1883.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4389\" src=\"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Hodiny-1883-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Hodiny-1883-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Hodiny-1883.jpg 720w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Dvorkovic-zveda-ruce.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4390\" src=\"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Dvorkovic-zveda-ruce-300x268.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"268\" srcset=\"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Dvorkovic-zveda-ruce-300x268.jpg 300w, https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Dvorkovic-zveda-ruce.jpg 338w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\" align=\"center\">Will everything turn out like this?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>N\u011bkdy se vyplat\u00ed zalistovat star\u00fdmi \u0161achov\u00fdmi \u010dasopisy. N\u011bkdy v&nbsp;polovin\u011b devades\u00e1t\u00fdch let jsem \u010detl rozhovor s&nbsp;tehdy mlad\u00fdm kaza\u0161sk\u00fdm velmistrem Vladislavem Tka\u010djevem, kter\u00fd pr\u00e1v\u011b vstupoval mezi sv\u011btovou elitu. Pamatuji si z&nbsp;n\u011bj jedinou my\u0161lenku \u2013 zato ale naprosto p\u0159esn\u011b. Tka\u010djev tehdy prohl\u00e1sil, \u017ee klasick\u00fd by m\u011bl ustoupit rychlej\u0161\u00edmu, dynami\u010dt\u011bj\u0161\u00edmu form\u00e1tu. Tehdy se rapidu \u0159\u00edkalo aktivn\u00ed \u0161ach a&nbsp;hr\u00e1lo se [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":4375,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4374","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-nezarazene"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4374","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4374"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4374\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4394,"href":"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4374\/revisions\/4394"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4375"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4374"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4374"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/skolasachu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4374"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}